Lesotho vs Saint Lucia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Lesotho
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 3 t against 2.72 t in Lesotho, a difference of 0.28 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 155th and Saint Lucia ranks 154th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.34 t | 0.38 t | 7.96 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 2.48 t | 0.735 t | 1.74 t | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 1.53 t | 3 t | 1.47 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Lesotho or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 3 t against 2.72 t in Lesotho as of 2020.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Lesotho and Saint Lucia?
- 0.28 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Saint Lucia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Lesotho and Saint Lucia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Lesotho ranks 155th and Saint Lucia ranks 154th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf