Madagascar vs Philippines: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Madagascar
- Philippines
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 18,027 t against 14,339 t in Philippines, a difference of 3,688 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.3 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Philippines ahead.
Madagascar ranks 40th and Philippines ranks 42nd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.52 t | 130,986 t | 130,980 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 26,487 t | 56,230 t | 29,744 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 25,813 t | 13,124 t | 12,689 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Madagascar or Philippines?
- Madagascar, at 18,027 t against 14,339 t in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Madagascar and Philippines?
- 3,688 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Philippines?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Madagascar and Philippines rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Madagascar ranks 40th and Philippines ranks 42nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf