Malta vs Niger: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity

Malta
4.69 t
in 2024
Niger
4.8 t
in 2023
Malta rank
149th
Niger rank
147th

Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time

  • Malta
  • Niger
0100200300200220132024

How they compare

Niger currently reports 4.8 t against 4.69 t in Malta, a difference of 0.11 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 149th and Niger ranks 147th of 189 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Niger in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 59.48 t 2.03 t 57.45 t Malta
2010s 5.11 t 0.28 t 4.83 t Malta
2020s 1.96 t 2.6 t 0.635 t Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Malta or Niger?
Niger, at 4.8 t against 4.69 t in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Malta and Niger?
0.11 t, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Niger?
9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Malta and Niger rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
Malta ranks 149th and Niger ranks 147th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
221 places, 4,328 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf