Nicaragua vs St. Kitts and Nevis: Ammonia, anhydrous β Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous β Import quantity over time
- Nicaragua
- St. Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
St. Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.23 t against 0.07 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.16 t.
That makes St. Kitts and Nevis's figure about 3.3 times Nicaragua's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 172nd and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 169th of 177 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | St. Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 174.2 t | 0.7712 t | 173.43 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 92.26 t | 1.37 t | 90.9 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous β import quantity, Nicaragua or St. Kitts and Nevis?
- St. Kitts and Nevis, at 0.23 t against 0.07 t in Nicaragua as of 2017.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous β import quantity between Nicaragua and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.16 t, with St. Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Nicaragua and St. Kitts and Nevis rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous β import quantity?
- Nicaragua ranks 172nd and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 169th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous β Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf