North Macedonia vs Oman: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- North Macedonia
- Oman
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 282.1 t against 237.23 t in Oman, a difference of 44.87 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 66th and Oman ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,351 t | 14.94 t | 1,336 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 369.58 t | 105.94 t | 263.64 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 272.95 t | 390.99 t | 118.05 t | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, North Macedonia or Oman?
- North Macedonia, at 282.1 t against 237.23 t in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between North Macedonia and Oman?
- 44.87 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Oman?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Oman rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- North Macedonia ranks 66th and Oman ranks 69th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf