Panama vs Yemen: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity

Panama
72.5 t
in 2024
Yemen
73.04 t
in 2023
Panama rank
95th
Yemen rank
94th

Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time

  • Panama
  • Yemen
0100200300200220132024

How they compare

Yemen currently reports 73.04 t against 72.5 t in Panama, a difference of 0.54 t.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Panama ranks 95th and Yemen ranks 94th of 189 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Yemen Difference Ahead
2000s 156.16 t 35.27 t 120.89 t Panama
2010s 142.02 t 26.8 t 115.22 t Panama
2020s 125.47 t 53.75 t 71.72 t Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Panama or Yemen?
Yemen, at 73.04 t against 72.5 t in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Panama and Yemen?
0.54 t, with Yemen ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Yemen?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Panama and Yemen rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
Panama ranks 95th and Yemen ranks 94th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
221 places, 4,328 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf