Papua New Guinea vs Qatar: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Qatar
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 28.05 t against 23.44 t in Qatar, a difference of 4.61 t.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 111th and Qatar ranks 114th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,623 t | 278.89 t | 1,345 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 26.46 t | 125.2 t | 98.74 t | Qatar |
| 2020s | 21.61 t | 23.94 t | 2.34 t | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Papua New Guinea or Qatar?
- Papua New Guinea, at 28.05 t against 23.44 t in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Papua New Guinea and Qatar?
- 4.61 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Qatar?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Qatar rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 111th and Qatar ranks 114th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf