Saudi Arabia vs Slovenia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 646.81 t against 609.57 t in Slovenia, a difference of 37.24 t.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovenia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 58th and Slovenia ranks 59th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.67 t | 117.27 t | 46.6 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 347.3 t | 378.67 t | 31.37 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 2,593 t | 537.77 t | 2,055 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Saudi Arabia or Slovenia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 646.81 t against 609.57 t in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Saudi Arabia and Slovenia?
- 37.24 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Slovenia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Slovenia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 58th and Slovenia ranks 59th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf