Saudi Arabia vs Sri Lanka: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 646.81 t against 537.71 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 109.1 t.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 58th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.67 t | 191.58 t | 120.91 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 347.3 t | 695.31 t | 348 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 2,593 t | 606.87 t | 1,986 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Saudi Arabia or Sri Lanka?
- Saudi Arabia, at 646.81 t against 537.71 t in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Saudi Arabia and Sri Lanka?
- 109.1 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Sri Lanka?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Sri Lanka rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 58th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf