South Africa vs Viet Nam: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- South Africa
- Viet Nam
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 146,205 t against 111,358 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 34,847 t.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 22nd and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86,668 t | 56,476 t | 30,192 t | South Africa |
| 2010s | 110,136 t | 129,932 t | 19,796 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 130,699 t | 118,197 t | 12,502 t | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, South Africa or Viet Nam?
- South Africa, at 146,205 t against 111,358 t in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between South Africa and Viet Nam?
- 34,847 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Viet Nam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do South Africa and Viet Nam rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- South Africa ranks 22nd and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf