Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Uzbekistan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.24 t against 0.23 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.01 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 169th and Uzbekistan ranks 168th of 177 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.71 t | 2.12 t | 1.41 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 1.03 t | 10.36 t | 9.33 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.24 t against 0.23 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uzbekistan?
- 0.01 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uzbekistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2017.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uzbekistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 169th and Uzbekistan ranks 168th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf