United Arab Emirates vs Zimbabwe: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity over time
- United Arab Emirates
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,527 t against 1,474 t in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 53 t.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
United Arab Emirates ranks 54th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 177 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,169 t | 7,944 t | 6,775 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 726.14 t | 7,390 t | 6,664 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1,046 t | 8,103 t | 7,056 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity, United Arab Emirates or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,527 t against 1,474 t in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity between United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
- 53 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import quantity?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 54th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf