Angola vs Sudan (former): Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Angola
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 191.72 1000 USD against 180.61 1000 USD in Angola, a difference of 11.11 1000 USD.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 79th and Sudan (former) ranks 77th of 189 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.15 1000 USD | 104.37 1000 USD | 9.22 1000 USD | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 68.04 1000 USD | 188.78 1000 USD | 120.74 1000 USD | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Angola or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 191.72 1000 USD against 180.61 1000 USD in Angola as of 2011.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Angola and Sudan (former)?
- 11.11 1000 USD, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sudan (former)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Angola and Sudan (former) rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Angola ranks 79th and Sudan (former) ranks 77th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf