Argentina vs New Caledonia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Argentina
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 153.33 1000 USD against 143.37 1000 USD in Argentina, a difference of 9.96 1000 USD.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Argentina ranks 85th and New Caledonia ranks 83rd of 189 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.48 1000 USD | 4.61 1000 USD | 95.86 1000 USD | Argentina |
| 2010s | 352.96 1000 USD | 97.12 1000 USD | 255.84 1000 USD | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Argentina or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 153.33 1000 USD against 143.37 1000 USD in Argentina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Argentina and New Caledonia?
- 9.96 1000 USD, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and New Caledonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Argentina and New Caledonia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Argentina ranks 85th and New Caledonia ranks 83rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf