Aruba vs Kyrgyzstan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Aruba
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 12.9 1000 USD against 10.04 1000 USD in Aruba, a difference of 2.86 1000 USD.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Aruba ranks 150th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 189 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.48 1000 USD | 214.95 1000 USD | 214.47 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 4.47 1000 USD | 171.22 1000 USD | 166.74 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 5.51 1000 USD | 22.21 1000 USD | 16.69 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Aruba or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 12.9 1000 USD against 10.04 1000 USD in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Aruba and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.86 1000 USD, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Kyrgyzstan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Aruba ranks 150th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf