Australia vs Indonesia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Australia
- Indonesia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 22,189 1000 USD against 21,308 1000 USD in Indonesia, a difference of 881 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 34th and Indonesia ranks 35th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37,472 1000 USD | 3,173 1000 USD | 34,299 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 37,052 1000 USD | 49,814 1000 USD | 12,762 1000 USD | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 33,340 1000 USD | 20,962 1000 USD | 12,378 1000 USD | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Australia or Indonesia?
- Australia, at 22,189 1000 USD against 21,308 1000 USD in Indonesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Australia and Indonesia?
- 881 1000 USD, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Indonesia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Indonesia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Australia ranks 34th and Indonesia ranks 35th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf