Australia vs Kazakhstan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Australia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 22,604 1000 USD against 22,189 1000 USD in Australia, a difference of 415 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 34th and Kazakhstan ranks 32nd of 189 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37,472 1000 USD | 2,577 1000 USD | 34,895 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 37,052 1000 USD | 5,294 1000 USD | 31,758 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2020s | 33,340 1000 USD | 23,681 1000 USD | 9,659 1000 USD | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Australia or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 22,604 1000 USD against 22,189 1000 USD in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 415 1000 USD, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Australia ranks 34th and Kazakhstan ranks 32nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf