Belarus vs Sierra Leone: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Belarus
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 9.66 1000 USD against 7.85 1000 USD in Belarus, a difference of 1.81 1000 USD.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 154th and Sierra Leone ranks 151st of 189 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 776.55 1000 USD | 16.89 1000 USD | 759.66 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 26,424 1000 USD | 60.24 1000 USD | 26,364 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Belarus or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 9.66 1000 USD against 7.85 1000 USD in Belarus as of 2015.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Belarus and Sierra Leone?
- 1.81 1000 USD, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sierra Leone?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Belarus and Sierra Leone rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Belarus ranks 154th and Sierra Leone ranks 151st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf