Belgium vs Norway: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Belgium
- Norway
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 362,148 1000 USD against 274,063 1000 USD in Norway, a difference of 88,085 1000 USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.3 times Norway's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 5th and Norway ranks 6th of 189 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 281,630 1000 USD | 114,104 1000 USD | 167,526 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 416,735 1000 USD | 195,062 1000 USD | 221,674 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 497,229 1000 USD | 308,310 1000 USD | 188,919 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Belgium or Norway?
- Belgium, at 362,148 1000 USD against 274,063 1000 USD in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Belgium and Norway?
- 88,085 1000 USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Norway?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Norway rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Belgium ranks 5th and Norway ranks 6th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf