Cambodia vs Uruguay: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Cambodia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 672.86 1000 USD against 615.49 1000 USD in Cambodia, a difference of 57.37 1000 USD.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uruguay ahead.
Cambodia ranks 64th and Uruguay ranks 62nd of 189 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.86 1000 USD | 127.91 1000 USD | 122.05 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 130.61 1000 USD | 324.27 1000 USD | 193.66 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 541 1000 USD | 552.12 1000 USD | 11.12 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Cambodia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 672.86 1000 USD against 615.49 1000 USD in Cambodia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Cambodia and Uruguay?
- 57.37 1000 USD, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Uruguay?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Uruguay rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Cambodia ranks 64th and Uruguay ranks 62nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf