Canada vs Madagascar: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Canada
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 8,905 1000 USD against 6,474 1000 USD in Canada, a difference of 2,431 1000 USD.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.4 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 42nd and Madagascar ranks 40th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,600 1000 USD | 21.16 1000 USD | 8,579 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2010s | 6,394 1000 USD | 12,491 1000 USD | 6,097 1000 USD | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 4,412 1000 USD | 17,072 1000 USD | 12,660 1000 USD | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Canada or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 8,905 1000 USD against 6,474 1000 USD in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Canada and Madagascar?
- 2,431 1000 USD, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Madagascar?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Madagascar rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Canada ranks 42nd and Madagascar ranks 40th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf