Canada vs Senegal: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Canada
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 9,507 1000 USD against 6,474 1000 USD in Canada, a difference of 3,033 1000 USD.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.5 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Senegal ahead.
Canada ranks 43rd and Senegal ranks 40th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,600 1000 USD | 5,564 1000 USD | 3,036 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2010s | 6,394 1000 USD | 5,146 1000 USD | 1,248 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2020s | 4,412 1000 USD | 8,987 1000 USD | 4,575 1000 USD | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Canada or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 9,507 1000 USD against 6,474 1000 USD in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Canada and Senegal?
- 3,033 1000 USD, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Senegal?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Senegal rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Canada ranks 43rd and Senegal ranks 40th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf