Chad vs Luxembourg: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Chad
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Chad currently reports 39.81 1000 USD against 37.22 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 2.59 1000 USD.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Chad ranks 124th and Luxembourg ranks 126th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.14 1000 USD | 124.13 1000 USD | 111.99 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 55.39 1000 USD | 41.7 1000 USD | 13.69 1000 USD | Chad |
| 2020s | 32.49 1000 USD | 31.2 1000 USD | 1.29 1000 USD | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Chad or Luxembourg?
- Chad, at 39.81 1000 USD against 37.22 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Chad and Luxembourg?
- 2.59 1000 USD, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Luxembourg?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Luxembourg rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Chad ranks 124th and Luxembourg ranks 126th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf