Chile vs Iran (Islamic Republic of): Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Chile
- Iran (Islamic Republic of)
How they compare
Chile currently reports 173,984 1000 USD against 2.73 1000 USD in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 173,981 1000 USD.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 12th and Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 12th of 177 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Iran (Islamic Republic of) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48,636 1000 USD | 6.72 1000 USD | 48,630 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 181,682 1000 USD | 7.57 1000 USD | 181,674 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Chile or Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
- Chile, at 173,984 1000 USD against 2.73 1000 USD in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Chile and Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
- 173,981 1000 USD, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Chile and Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Chile ranks 12th and Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 12th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf