China, mainland vs Finland: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- China, mainland
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 214,086 1000 USD against 197,599 1000 USD in China, mainland, a difference of 16,487 1000 USD.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times China, mainland's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
China, mainland ranks 11th and Finland ranks 9th of 189 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, mainland | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49,326 1000 USD | 99,243 1000 USD | 49,916 1000 USD | Finland |
| 2010s | 164,397 1000 USD | 188,215 1000 USD | 23,818 1000 USD | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, China, mainland or Finland?
- Finland, at 214,086 1000 USD against 197,599 1000 USD in China, mainland as of 2013.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between China, mainland and Finland?
- 16,487 1000 USD, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Finland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2013.
- How do China, mainland and Finland rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- China, mainland ranks 11th and Finland ranks 9th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf