Congo vs Luxembourg: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Congo
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 37.22 1000 USD against 36.04 1000 USD in Congo, a difference of 1.18 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Congo ranks 127th and Luxembourg ranks 126th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.36 1000 USD | 153.88 1000 USD | 115.53 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 38.02 1000 USD | 40.8 1000 USD | 2.78 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 134.19 1000 USD | 32.4 1000 USD | 101.79 1000 USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Congo or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 37.22 1000 USD against 36.04 1000 USD in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Congo and Luxembourg?
- 1.18 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Luxembourg?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Luxembourg rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Congo ranks 127th and Luxembourg ranks 126th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf