Croatia vs Libya: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Croatia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 222.46 1000 USD against 196.58 1000 USD in Croatia, a difference of 25.88 1000 USD.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 76th and Libya ranks 74th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,343 1000 USD | 26.68 1000 USD | 1,316 1000 USD | Croatia |
| 2010s | 47.96 1000 USD | 217.4 1000 USD | 169.44 1000 USD | Libya |
| 2020s | 780.79 1000 USD | 123.1 1000 USD | 657.69 1000 USD | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Croatia or Libya?
- Libya, at 222.46 1000 USD against 196.58 1000 USD in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Croatia and Libya?
- 25.88 1000 USD, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Libya?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Libya rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Croatia ranks 76th and Libya ranks 74th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf