Cuba vs Guatemala: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Cuba
- Guatemala
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 3,029 1000 USD against 2,684 1000 USD in Guatemala, a difference of 345 1000 USD.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 48th and Guatemala ranks 49th of 189 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25,639 1000 USD | 1,625 1000 USD | 24,015 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2010s | 13,940 1000 USD | 2,102 1000 USD | 11,839 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2020s | 8,949 1000 USD | 4,207 1000 USD | 4,742 1000 USD | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Cuba or Guatemala?
- Cuba, at 3,029 1000 USD against 2,684 1000 USD in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Cuba and Guatemala?
- 345 1000 USD, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guatemala?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Guatemala rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Cuba ranks 48th and Guatemala ranks 49th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf