Cyprus vs Kyrgyzstan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Cyprus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 14.76 1000 USD against 12.9 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.86 1000 USD.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Cyprus ranks 144th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.46 1000 USD | 105.65 1000 USD | 87.2 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 11.22 1000 USD | 190.7 1000 USD | 179.48 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 20.59 1000 USD | 18.37 1000 USD | 2.22 1000 USD | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Cyprus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Cyprus, at 14.76 1000 USD against 12.9 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Cyprus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.86 1000 USD, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Cyprus ranks 144th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf