Czechia vs Tunisia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Czechia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 100,520 1000 USD against 60,590 1000 USD in Tunisia, a difference of 39,930 1000 USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.7 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tunisia ahead.
Czechia ranks 22nd and Tunisia ranks 25th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52,947 1000 USD | 91,216 1000 USD | 38,268 1000 USD | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 69,453 1000 USD | 87,324 1000 USD | 17,871 1000 USD | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 98,840 1000 USD | 89,356 1000 USD | 9,484 1000 USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Czechia or Tunisia?
- Czechia, at 100,520 1000 USD against 60,590 1000 USD in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Czechia and Tunisia?
- 39,930 1000 USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Tunisia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Tunisia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Czechia ranks 22nd and Tunisia ranks 25th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf