Czechia vs Viet Nam: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Czechia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 100,520 1000 USD against 73,581 1000 USD in Viet Nam, a difference of 26,939 1000 USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.4 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 22nd and Viet Nam ranks 23rd of 189 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52,947 1000 USD | 16,265 1000 USD | 36,682 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 64,952 1000 USD | 50,454 1000 USD | 14,497 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 98,420 1000 USD | 72,462 1000 USD | 25,959 1000 USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Czechia or Viet Nam?
- Czechia, at 100,520 1000 USD against 73,581 1000 USD in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Czechia and Viet Nam?
- 26,939 1000 USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Viet Nam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Viet Nam rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Czechia ranks 22nd and Viet Nam ranks 23rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf