Ecuador vs Saudi Arabia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Ecuador
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 822.37 1000 USD against 741.52 1000 USD in Ecuador, a difference of 80.85 1000 USD.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 60th and Saudi Arabia ranks 58th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 264.26 1000 USD | 215.04 1000 USD | 49.22 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 475.6 1000 USD | 133.26 1000 USD | 342.34 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 789.35 1000 USD | 1,930 1000 USD | 1,140 1000 USD | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Ecuador or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 822.37 1000 USD against 741.52 1000 USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Ecuador and Saudi Arabia?
- 80.85 1000 USD, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Saudi Arabia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Saudi Arabia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Ecuador ranks 60th and Saudi Arabia ranks 58th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf