Egypt vs Nicaragua: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Egypt
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0.94 1000 USD against 0.75 1000 USD in Egypt, a difference of 0.19 1000 USD.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.3 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 168th and Nicaragua ranks 167th of 177 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 891.92 1000 USD | 100.35 1000 USD | 791.57 1000 USD | Egypt |
| 2010s | 1,410 1000 USD | 123.33 1000 USD | 1,287 1000 USD | Egypt |
| 2020s | 24,308 1000 USD | 67.63 1000 USD | 24,240 1000 USD | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Egypt or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 0.94 1000 USD against 0.75 1000 USD in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Egypt and Nicaragua?
- 0.19 1000 USD, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Nicaragua?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Nicaragua rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Egypt ranks 168th and Nicaragua ranks 167th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf