El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- El Salvador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 1,924 1000 USD against 1,406 1000 USD in Zimbabwe, a difference of 518 1000 USD.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 177 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 550.76 1000 USD | 2,435 1000 USD | 1,885 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 642.72 1000 USD | 4,571 1000 USD | 3,928 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1,924 1000 USD | 13,057 1000 USD | 11,133 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
- El Salvador, at 1,924 1000 USD against 1,406 1000 USD in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
- 518 1000 USD, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- El Salvador ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf