Equatorial Guinea vs Malta: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 45.39 1000 USD against 44.89 1000 USD in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.5 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malta ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Malta ranks 121st of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.84 1000 USD | 33.69 1000 USD | 24.85 1000 USD | Malta |
| 2010s | 9.11 1000 USD | 12.42 1000 USD | 3.31 1000 USD | Malta |
| 2020s | 26.7 1000 USD | 17.39 1000 USD | 9.3 1000 USD | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Equatorial Guinea or Malta?
- Malta, at 45.39 1000 USD against 44.89 1000 USD in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Equatorial Guinea and Malta?
- 0.5 1000 USD, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Malta?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Malta rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Malta ranks 121st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf