Eswatini vs Niger: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Niger
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2.19 1000 USD against 1.68 1000 USD in Niger, a difference of 0.51 1000 USD.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 175th and Niger ranks 177th of 189 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.05 1000 USD | 4.15 1000 USD | 34.9 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 9.6 1000 USD | 5.67 1000 USD | 3.93 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1.54 1000 USD | 1.08 1000 USD | 0.46 1000 USD | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Eswatini or Niger?
- Eswatini, at 2.19 1000 USD against 1.68 1000 USD in Niger as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Eswatini and Niger?
- 0.51 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Niger?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Niger rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 175th and Niger ranks 177th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf