Ethiopia vs Panama: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Ethiopia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 137.65 1000 USD against 127.87 1000 USD in Ethiopia, a difference of 9.78 1000 USD.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Panama ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 91st and Panama ranks 88th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.1 1000 USD | 122.86 1000 USD | 46.76 1000 USD | Panama |
| 2010s | 248.45 1000 USD | 142.68 1000 USD | 105.77 1000 USD | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 140.97 1000 USD | 198.93 1000 USD | 57.96 1000 USD | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Ethiopia or Panama?
- Panama, at 137.65 1000 USD against 127.87 1000 USD in Ethiopia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Ethiopia and Panama?
- 9.78 1000 USD, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Panama?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Panama rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Ethiopia ranks 91st and Panama ranks 88th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf