Georgia vs Malawi: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Georgia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 16.92 1000 USD against 14.28 1000 USD in Georgia, a difference of 2.64 1000 USD.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malawi ahead.
Georgia ranks 146th and Malawi ranks 143rd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 133.12 1000 USD | 14.92 1000 USD | 118.2 1000 USD | Georgia |
| 2010s | 161.78 1000 USD | 12.31 1000 USD | 149.47 1000 USD | Georgia |
| 2020s | 4.12 1000 USD | 13.82 1000 USD | 9.71 1000 USD | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Georgia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 16.92 1000 USD against 14.28 1000 USD in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Georgia and Malawi?
- 2.64 1000 USD, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malawi?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Malawi rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Georgia ranks 146th and Malawi ranks 143rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf