Ghana vs New Zealand: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Ghana
- New Zealand
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 171.1 1000 USD against 152.66 1000 USD in New Zealand, a difference of 18.44 1000 USD.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 78th and New Zealand ranks 80th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 169.47 1000 USD | 135.02 1000 USD | 34.44 1000 USD | Ghana |
| 2010s | 170.23 1000 USD | 236.2 1000 USD | 65.97 1000 USD | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 222.79 1000 USD | 156.29 1000 USD | 66.5 1000 USD | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Ghana or New Zealand?
- Ghana, at 171.1 1000 USD against 152.66 1000 USD in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Ghana and New Zealand?
- 18.44 1000 USD, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and New Zealand?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and New Zealand rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Ghana ranks 78th and New Zealand ranks 80th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf