Guatemala vs Romania: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Guatemala
- Romania
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 2,684 1000 USD against 2,155 1000 USD in Romania, a difference of 529 1000 USD.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 49th and Romania ranks 51st of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,677 1000 USD | 41.46 1000 USD | 1,635 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 2,102 1000 USD | 176.88 1000 USD | 1,925 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 3,902 1000 USD | 4,144 1000 USD | 241.89 1000 USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Guatemala or Romania?
- Guatemala, at 2,684 1000 USD against 2,155 1000 USD in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Guatemala and Romania?
- 529 1000 USD, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Romania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Romania rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Guatemala ranks 49th and Romania ranks 51st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf