Guinea vs Iceland: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Guinea
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 96.15 1000 USD against 91.16 1000 USD in Guinea, a difference of 4.99 1000 USD.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Iceland ahead.
Guinea ranks 100th and Iceland ranks 99th of 189 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.51 1000 USD | 89.66 1000 USD | 71.15 1000 USD | Iceland |
| 2010s | 56.23 1000 USD | 141.03 1000 USD | 84.79 1000 USD | Iceland |
| 2020s | 73.14 1000 USD | 117.42 1000 USD | 44.28 1000 USD | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Guinea or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 96.15 1000 USD against 91.16 1000 USD in Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Guinea and Iceland?
- 4.99 1000 USD, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Iceland?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guinea and Iceland rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Guinea ranks 100th and Iceland ranks 99th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf