Haiti vs Sri Lanka: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Haiti
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 415.8 1000 USD against 366.35 1000 USD in Haiti, a difference of 49.45 1000 USD.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Haiti's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Haiti ranks 68th and Sri Lanka ranks 67th of 189 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.59 1000 USD | 120.21 1000 USD | 56.62 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 279.84 1000 USD | 423.31 1000 USD | 143.48 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 356.39 1000 USD | 595.02 1000 USD | 238.64 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Haiti or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 415.8 1000 USD against 366.35 1000 USD in Haiti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Haiti and Sri Lanka?
- 49.45 1000 USD, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Sri Lanka?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Haiti and Sri Lanka rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Haiti ranks 68th and Sri Lanka ranks 67th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf