Israel vs Viet Nam: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Israel
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 73,581 1000 USD against 52,214 1000 USD in Israel, a difference of 21,367 1000 USD.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.4 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 26th and Viet Nam ranks 23rd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34,062 1000 USD | 16,265 1000 USD | 17,797 1000 USD | Israel |
| 2010s | 38,941 1000 USD | 50,454 1000 USD | 11,514 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 61,149 1000 USD | 72,462 1000 USD | 11,313 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Israel or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 73,581 1000 USD against 52,214 1000 USD in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Israel and Viet Nam?
- 21,367 1000 USD, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Viet Nam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Viet Nam rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Israel ranks 26th and Viet Nam ranks 23rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf