Italy vs Lithuania: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Italy
- Lithuania
How they compare
Italy currently reports 43,834 1000 USD against 40,698 1000 USD in Lithuania, a difference of 3,136 1000 USD.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 29th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30,404 1000 USD | 61,780 1000 USD | 31,377 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 21,938 1000 USD | 68,760 1000 USD | 46,822 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 74,004 1000 USD | 49,272 1000 USD | 24,732 1000 USD | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Italy or Lithuania?
- Italy, at 43,834 1000 USD against 40,698 1000 USD in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Italy and Lithuania?
- 3,136 1000 USD, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Lithuania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Lithuania rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Italy ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 29th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf