Jamaica vs Mauritania: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Jamaica
- Mauritania
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 61.57 1000 USD against 58.87 1000 USD in Mauritania, a difference of 2.7 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 111th and Mauritania ranks 114th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.92 1000 USD | 1.01 1000 USD | 64.92 1000 USD | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 86.36 1000 USD | 23.49 1000 USD | 62.87 1000 USD | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 90.99 1000 USD | 95.25 1000 USD | 4.26 1000 USD | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Jamaica or Mauritania?
- Jamaica, at 61.57 1000 USD against 58.87 1000 USD in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Jamaica and Mauritania?
- 2.7 1000 USD, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Mauritania rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Jamaica ranks 111th and Mauritania ranks 114th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf