Japan vs South Africa: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Japan
- South Africa
How they compare
Japan currently reports 109,216 1000 USD against 61,026 1000 USD in South Africa, a difference of 48,190 1000 USD.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.8 times South Africa's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 23rd of 177 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69,937 1000 USD | 21,809 1000 USD | 48,128 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 117,567 1000 USD | 47,887 1000 USD | 69,681 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2020s | 133,014 1000 USD | 79,164 1000 USD | 53,850 1000 USD | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Japan or South Africa?
- Japan, at 109,216 1000 USD against 61,026 1000 USD in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Japan and South Africa?
- 48,190 1000 USD, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Japan and South Africa rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Japan ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 23rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf