Jordan vs Portugal: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Jordan
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 125,337 1000 USD against 113,806 1000 USD in Jordan, a difference of 11,531 1000 USD.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 20th and Portugal ranks 18th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,856 1000 USD | 10,903 1000 USD | 9,047 1000 USD | Portugal |
| 2010s | 10,052 1000 USD | 54,760 1000 USD | 44,709 1000 USD | Portugal |
| 2020s | 133,624 1000 USD | 130,731 1000 USD | 2,893 1000 USD | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Jordan or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 125,337 1000 USD against 113,806 1000 USD in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Jordan and Portugal?
- 11,531 1000 USD, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Portugal?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Portugal rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Jordan ranks 20th and Portugal ranks 18th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf