Jordan vs Viet Nam: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Jordan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 113,806 1000 USD against 73,581 1000 USD in Viet Nam, a difference of 40,225 1000 USD.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.5 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Jordan ranks 20th and Viet Nam ranks 23rd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,856 1000 USD | 18,116 1000 USD | 16,259 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 10,052 1000 USD | 39,559 1000 USD | 29,508 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 138,579 1000 USD | 72,462 1000 USD | 66,117 1000 USD | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Jordan or Viet Nam?
- Jordan, at 113,806 1000 USD against 73,581 1000 USD in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Jordan and Viet Nam?
- 40,225 1000 USD, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Viet Nam?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Viet Nam rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Jordan ranks 20th and Viet Nam ranks 23rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf