Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 34,323 1000 USD against 22,604 1000 USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 11,719 1000 USD.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.5 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 30th of 189 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,242 1000 USD | 2,309 1000 USD | 66.93 1000 USD | Serbia |
| 2010s | 5,294 1000 USD | 5,931 1000 USD | 637.35 1000 USD | Serbia |
| 2020s | 23,681 1000 USD | 32,099 1000 USD | 8,418 1000 USD | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 34,323 1000 USD against 22,604 1000 USD in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 11,719 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Kazakhstan ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 30th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf