Libya vs North Macedonia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value
Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value over time
- Libya
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 222.46 1000 USD against 217.8 1000 USD in North Macedonia, a difference of 4.66 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Libya ranks 72nd and North Macedonia ranks 73rd of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.68 1000 USD | 358.31 1000 USD | 331.62 1000 USD | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 217.4 1000 USD | 195.32 1000 USD | 22.08 1000 USD | Libya |
| 2020s | 123.1 1000 USD | 240.58 1000 USD | 117.49 1000 USD | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — import value, Libya or North Macedonia?
- Libya, at 222.46 1000 USD against 217.8 1000 USD in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — import value between Libya and North Macedonia?
- 4.66 1000 USD, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and North Macedonia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Libya and North Macedonia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — import value?
- Libya ranks 72nd and North Macedonia ranks 73rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf